Digital watches digital

Disclosure of a Confidential Informant in Court does the informant have recourse if disclosed? - clause for confidential emails

Take all the standards are met, and this is purely hypothetical.

A police informant agreed to help and expressly declares that he wants his identity, is confidential and is recognized by state authorities. Defendant Cogen with many drugs and the defendant, the Court examined the validity of the regulation on the basis that the informant was unreliable. Let us assume that all standards are respected in the legal proceedings and the identity of confidential informants should be given to determine known because the case is mounted as a whole on their reliability.

My question ... Publication of names of persons that could be the text / sa great harm through retaliation in any way by the defendant or someone you know. Bare in mind that there is a confidentiality agreement, which has recognized. If the courts need to disclose the confidential informant that the informant has only agreed to disclose information if it confidential.

Now his life is potentially at risk and the defendant knows thatThat is what makes it dirty. Ok Police to ask that person in the witness protection ... Now that the informant has to change his life, because as they tried to help police and productive disadvantages.

The big question ... This informant is not entitled to sue the State Civil ... the confidentiality agreement was not completed, and dramatically changed their lives due to the fact that his identity was revealed by the force. If you can not continue this type of clause for the state responsible? You agree that you are sworn to secrecy, no, now is his live in danger and need to move ... How the state can not be civilly liable?